“Clean Fiction” as White Magic

by Mike Duran @CerebralGrump

glindaA while back, in a discussion about Christian speculative fiction and where it’s heading, I suggested that “‘bad theology’ has shaped much of mainstream Christian fiction.” One aspect of this “bad theology” is the belief
that reading “clean fiction” — and by this, Christians normally mean
fiction without sex, profanity, excessive violence, occult themes, etc. —
is better for one’s soul, more in line with holiness and godliness,
than reading darker, more R-rated stuff. 

“Clean fiction” is part of the toolbox of evangelical holiness and separation from the world.

So it wasn’t much of a surprise when televangelist Pat Robertson claimed that watching horror movies can invite demons into ones soul. My rather snide response was, “Of
course, watching horror movies can invite demons into your soul. So can
watching The Bachelor, Jimmy Fallon, and Carl Sagan’s Cosmos.” Point
being: Horror movies aren’t inherently evil; the devil is an “angel of
light” and can use seemingly good things to deceive. 

An undiscerning, undiscriminating,
unbelieving, naive, morally confused mind is more a gateway to the
demonic than are horror movies.

E. Stephen Burnett commented that Robertson’s response is typical of a bigger problem: “Christians pushing ‘white magic’ in response to ‘black magic.’ Burnett continued:

believe Christians invite the work of Satan more often when they react
to supposed devilish “black magic” work and therefore resort to “white
magic” methods of protection to control their environments, protect the
dynasty, promote fertility and agriculture, etc. …

divination methods can include the “prosperity gospel,”
prayer-as-mantra, that “prayer mat” that comes in the mail, listening to
new revelation from voices, and even (I’m afraid this is going to be
very unpopular) putting faith in manmade corporation-building methods to
build churches rather than having faith in God’s Spirit to make our
efforts bear fruit.

This got me thinking — which I will do out loud — and you can tell me where I’m wrong.

I think E. is spot-on in his assessment. There are many “evangelical
divination methods.” Of course, we don’t see them as divination methods.
Nevertheless, they are little different than the spells,
counter-spells, protective spells, and iconography employed by many
occultists. We just attach biblical jargon and imagery.

  • “Pray this.”
  • “Bless that.”
  • “Stay away from these people, places, or things.”
  • “Repeat these words and believe them with all your heart.”
  • “Don’t watch, listen to, or speak that.”

I would include Christians’ penchant for — I could say “obsession”
with –  “clean fiction” as a possible “evangelical divination method.”
In other words, we’ve come to believe that reading THIS as opposed to
THAT, reading THIS word as opposed to THAT word, including THIS
description as opposed to THAT description, makes a story more or less
worldly or other-worldly, holy or unholy.

The problem with that approach is that it puts stories, more specifically words,
in the category of… magic. We see the correct combination of words, or
the exclusion of specific words, as possessing an inherent power, for
good or evil. As such, Christian fiction is the “white magic” that counters the spell of secular fiction, which is “black magic.” 

Here’s the problem: The word “shit” does not have magical powers.

The belief that keeping THAT word out of my story makes it intrinsically less worldly and more holy,
is akin to white magic. It’s little different than the sorceress who
believes that uttering THIS word invokes THAT power and refraining from
THAT word prohibits THIS power.

Of course, there is a legitimate biblical basis for avoiding crap, and taking heed to what we read, listen to, and view. But just
because someone reads Christian fiction, watches only “family friendly”
films, or doesn’t curse, does not automatically make them any more
holy, healthy, or happy than someone who doesn’t
. In fact, the Bible warns that there may be a subtle danger in consigning ourselves only to what is “clean” (see: Pharisees).

In other words, reading “clean fiction” does not cast a protective spell over ones mind and heart. You still need discernment! In fact, the notion that “clean fiction” is actually safer and better for us  might actually deceive us and distance us from God!

The desire to keep our minds focused on what is “pure, lovely, and
admirable” is a great thing. Heck, it’s biblical! Nevertheless, that
same Bible says that Satan disguises himself as an “angel of light” (II
Cor. 11:14). In other words, Satan is more likely to deceive us with
something that looks good (“clean”), than something that looks evil. Just
because some stories are free of profanity, violence, and nudity, does
not make them impervious to spiritual deception. In fact, the desire to
read only what is “free of profanity, violence, and nudity” may itself
be a spiritual deception.

Okay. So that’s my theory. 

How is our rigid avoidance of profanity and R-rated
content NOT superstition, a form of white magic that believes the
absence and exclusion of specific words makes one more holy?

* * *

Mike Duran is a monthly contributor to Novel Rocket, and is represented by the
rockin’ Rachelle
of Books & Such
. Mike’s novels include The TellingThe
, an ebook novella, Winterland, and his newly
released short story anthology Subterranea. You can visit his website at www.mikeduran.com, or follow
him on Facebook and Twitter.